Acer beTouch E110 US versionDiscontinuedALSO KNOWN AS | |
|---|---|
Construction | |
| Dimension | 103.5x54x13.4mm (4.07x2.13x0.53") |
| Weight | 105gr (3.7oz) |
| Form Factor | Candy Bar |
| Material | |
| Colors | |
| Metal Frame | |
Usability | |
| Display Resolution | 240x320px |
| Display Size | 43x57mm (1.69x2.24") ~143PPI |
| Display Diagonal | 2.8" |
| Display Type | 256K TFT |
| Secondary Display Resolution | |
| Input | Navigation Joystick / Button Capacitive Touchscreen |
| Talk Time | |
| Standby Time | |
| OS | Android OS, v1.5 |
| Java | Available |
| Vibration | Available |
| Ringtone | Polyphonic |
Hardware | |
| Chipset | |
| Processor | 416MHz |
| GPU | |
| Ram | 256MB |
| Internal Memory | 512MB |
| External Memory | microSD |
| Camera Resolution | 3.15 Megapixel |
| Camera Flash | |
| Camera Lens | |
| Optical Zoom | |
| Front Camera | |
| Second Front Camera | |
| Front Camera Flash | |
| Other Functionalities | |
| Speaker | Mono |
| Battery Capacity | 1500mAh |
| Battery Type | |
Connectivity | |
| WIMAX | |
| WiFi | |
| UPnP | |
| NFC | |
| USB | v2.0 |
| Bluetooth | v2.0 |
| Positioning System | Integrated GPS |
| TV Receiver | |
| TV Out | |
| Audio Output | 3.5mm Jack |
| Radio | FM |
| Ethernet | |
| Infrared | |
Cellular Network | |
| Network Compatibility | GSM 1800, 1900, 850, 900 UMTS 900, 2100 HSPA 900, 2100 GSM 1800, 1900, 850, 900 UMTS 850, 1900 HSPA 850, 1900 |
| SIM Cards | Mini |
| PTT | |
| HSCSD | |
| GPRS | Class 10 |
| EDGE | Class 10 |
| AMPS | |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
Operators | |
Everything Everywhere | GSM 1800 |
O2 | GSM 1800 / GSM 900 |
Vodafone | GSM 1800 / GSM 900 |
Three | |
VARIOUS | |
| Price Range | |
World Compatibility
N/A
2G
3G
3.5G
4G
REVIEWS
55 out of 100
Phone Arena
Acer beTouch E110 was among the few phones that the company introduced at the 2010 Mobile World Congress. It is squarely positioned as an entry level touchscreen Android device as hinted by ... read more
50 out of 100
CNET Asia
The Acer beTouch E110 is far from unusable, but a higher-resolution screen and access to the Android app store are sorely lacking. Also unremarkable in terms of appearance, there are much better phones available at a similar price. read more
